menu
~ ~


Early and late bloomers

by Robert Genn

Economist David Galenson of the University of Chicago has published several books and countless papers on the genesis of creativity.

Odd business for an economist, you might say, but his research is largely based on exhaustive research into the number of times certain works of art are published in art books, mentioned by critics, or have achieved high prices at auctions.

His conclusions include the startling finding that some of the great artists peak early, while others don't do their best till later on. We are of two main types, he says.

Some are quick and dramatic, what he calls conceptual innovators. Others are slow and plodding, what he calls experimental innovators.

Picasso is of the first type, producing his best and most important work before the age of thirty. Cezanne is of the latter -- steady growth and refinement until his best work comes late in life.

This is, of course, like reinventing the wheel -- even if it has a few flat sides. Basing creative greatness on the vagaries of fashionable criticism, publication frequency, or even prices achieved, is so loaded with potholes that it's hardly worth driving there.

What to do with Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema, who died in 1912 one of the highest paid painters of all time, but who now hardly appears on the radar.

Or Maxfield Parrish who in his time sold almost as many photo-lithos as Thomas Kinkade.

Or Mark Rothko whose high prices, drooling critiques and popular acclaim seem to be due to a few dealers and critics who took control and had a run with a goodly supply of his work after he had gone to the big studio in the sky.

Galenson's research does give some condolence to those late bloomers who finally get it.

He also shakes up the notion that genius is a youth thing where the likes of Mozart can knock off a small bagatelle at age four months.

Through all the misinformation and self-perpetuating myth, the mystery of creativity further deepens.

"Many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first," says the New Testament. I rather like the idea of an Artists' Pearly Gates where a clear thinking and unsullied St. Peter-like character evaluates incoming artists according to quality, craftsmanship, joy, wonder, imagination, taste, content, etc., and their ability not to privately bore people.

A lot of the truly bad, I'm sorry to say, might just have to be punished.

But then again, only an economist or a fool could say who those might be.

Best regards,

Robert

PS: "Applying the fiercely analytic, quantitative tools of modern economics, Galenson has reverse engineered ingenuity to reveal the source code of the creative mind." (Daniel H. Pink - author of A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future)

Esoterica: Cezanne did not preconceive his work, but rather let the painting-in-progress tell him what it needed. He took a long time, was always dissatisfied, and bloomed late.

The highest prices for Cezanne's paintings are from the year he died. He's the third most illustrated French artist of the Twentieth Century. Of all his reproduced and celebrated images, only 2% are from his twenties.

By far the most popular are from when he was an "old man." Less than ten percent of Cezanne's works are actually signed. Picasso signed everything, including the tablecloth.

~ ~ ~ 

Robert Genn


(c) Copyright 2006 Robert Genn

From The Robert Genn Twice-Weekly Letter

Image from his book: The Painter's Keys : A Seminar With Robert Genn

R
elated book: Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity - by David W. Galenson


   Related Talent Development Resources pages:

More articles by Robert Genn

Creativity enhancement articles

Visual arts

Visual arts books

visual arts resources
: interviews sites videos

~ ~ ~