|

Sandra
Tsing Loh
interview
by Douglas Eby
Sandra
Tsing Loh is a writer, performer and radio program host. Her show "Loh
Life" is on KCRW-FM, and her written work has appeared in publications
including Buzz, The New York Times, Vogue, Elle and Harper's
Bazaar.
Her
one-person show "Depth Becomes Her" premiered in April,1997 at The
Taper,
Too Theater in Los Angeles, and was inspired by her book "Depth Takes a
Holiday: Essays From Lesser Los Angeles", which was based on her former
"Valley" column in Buzz magazine. Her fiction includes "Aliens In
America"
and "If You Lived Here, You'd Be Home By Now".
~ ~ ~
Q:
In reviewing
your own personal development, would you say there are any particular
aspects
of your family life, education or other areas, that furthered your
creative
growth?
A: I
think in
growing up, my parents, my mother particularly, were extremely
supportive
of whatever we were doing. And she just instilled the notion that
whatever
we decided to do, we would not fail. Although both my parents wanted to
steer us into science, and in fact I have a B.S. in science.
So
the good
part was they told us we were really smart and talented and could do
anything.
Possibly the down side was they were sure not of us could make a living
in anything liberal arts, so we should use our brilliance to become
aerospace
engineers. So it's a two-sided coin.
Q:
What was
your parents background?
A:
My mother
was German and my father is Chinese, and he is a scientist, and she was
60s housewife. And we had a lot of piano lessons, ballet lessons. They
instilled all these lessons into us pretty early on.
Q:
Was that
something you enjoyed as well?
A:
Sometimes
enjoyed, sometimes not. Sometimes it was a complete burden, and a
hassle,
and a pain. I really wanted to be in the Brownies, and never got to be
because of being too busy going to ballet lessons. So we fought against
that, but overall, in retrospect, I'm glad that it happened that
way.
Q:
What would
you say was one of the first areas of creative expression that you got
to choose for yourself?
A: I
actually
began as a painter, when I was a kid and teenager, and into college. I
painted all the time. I no longer do that at all. But I was always
painting,
for whatever reason, and then in college I started composing at the
piano,
little compositions.
Q:
When did
you first get involved with writing?
A: I
didn't
really get involved with it until graduate school, when I was about 22,
when I went to graduate school in English. I was at USC and I noticed
they
had a writing program, with playwriting, and I'd always loved
playwriting
and the idea of it, so I just decided that I would try everything at
that
point, since I was no longer going to be a scientist.
Q:
Was it an
ongoing issue for you in any sense, choosing not to pursue
science?
A:
Yes, it was
a very very big issue. When I graduated from CalTech with a BS in
physics,
and went on to English in grad school -- in our family, with our
values,
it was kind of a failure not to go on to your PhD in physics. To go on
to a PhD in English was like a failure, because it was a soft
topic.
So
that was
a big crisis. I was the youngest in my family, but the first to break
out
of that, and it was all very shocking to everyone, and it looked like I
was at the beginning of a tragic tumble into living as a street
person.
Q:
Was going
to CalTech a good experience for you?
A:
Not really.
I didn't enjoy the work, and didn't understand the work. I think I was
regarded as a very odd person, indeed. I didn't fit there, and I didn't
know what I was doing. I was bad in science. It was kind of a
mess.
Q:
That whole
idea of fitting in, and not fitting in, seeing oneself as an outsider,
is a common theme with talented people. That came up in a recent
interview
I had with director Caroline Thompson. Do you continue to feel
that?
A:
Yes, and
I think there are a lot of reasons. Growing up, in junior high school
especially,
when I went to Malibu Parks Junior High, where we literally had movie
stars
going to our school, I mean you were definitely of the 'nerdy kid'
group,
as opposed to the popular kids.
You
were taking
cello lessons, and in the Latin Club, and such a geek compared to
everyone
else. And junior high is a particularly horrible time. But I remember
around
that time I and my friends, who were totally the nerds, had real fun
starting
our own little clubs and stuff like that.
If
you see photos
of us then, we look so geeky, but there's a joy in our creativity that
we're building, imagining a whole second world where we rule the world
and have power.
I
think that's
what makes creative people -- the most popular kids in junior high, who
won the popularity contests, the beauty contests, zero of them have
gone
on, I believe, to do anything creative. Except for the few people who
were
actors, and that's a whole other story.
Q:
Have you
seen the new Apple Computer ads which celebrate creative people, and
talk
about how they are often outsiders? There seems to be a growing sense
of
appreciation of creative individuals.
A:
Absolutely,
and I think of myself as a humorist, and that's been really important;
in everything I've done there's been comedy. And with the comics I
admire,
they do come from an outsider place, and can take whatever enrages them
or makes them cry or whatever, and transform that into something
hysterically
funny.
I
think that
is the tool, that's what comics do; they are very much outsiders, they
are not in power, they're the underdog, and that's what makes them
funny.
Q:
Are there
any specific women comics you particularly admire?
A:
Well, I always
loved Fran Lebowitz, from way back when, and also the fiction of
Flannery
O'Connor, which is so incredible. And she was very much an outsider
when
she was writing.
I
also love
Jane Austen, and I get the sense from her that she's looking at these
different
social classes in England, and sees the pain of being outside of one,
or
into another, or something that's very sly and very witty. None of
these
women were homecoming queens.
And
I also love
Janeane Garofalo. I think everyone does, and she is wonderful. She's
inside
Hollywood, but yet outside it, and that informs her work.
Q:
Now that
you have established yourself as a writer and radio program host and so
on, is your family more accepting and supportive?
A:
Yes, I think
they are, and my father is certainly, since I use him as a topic, he's
thrilled that he's getting his moment of fame. I don't know deeply what
this means for him, maybe he always wanted to be a performer and was
never
allowed to be, which is why he thought we shouldn't, or whatever. But
now,
he's really thrilled. And I think they're relieved that it looks like
I'm
not going to become a homeless person.
Q:
Do you think
of yourself as a performer, or do you even categorize yourself?
A: I
think of
myself as a humorist, and a storyteller, and whatever form that comes
out
in, whether it's a novel that adheres to the rules of a novel, or
essays
-- and I'm going to go back to New York in January and do another solo
Off-Broadway show.
And
that springs
out of my writing, and performing. I'm not really an actress per se,
but
I perform these monologues that are stories in the vernacular I would
tell
them, so it's sort of a bastardized form of theater where you're kind
of
yourself, telling a story. So I do a lot of different forms, and they
reflect
humorous stories, and tragic-humorous stories.
Q:
One of the
women I quoted in an article was Jodie Foster commenting about
questioning
her abilities as an actress, and even thinking of quitting just before
she got an Oscar nomination for "The Accused".
A: I
think that's
both good and bad. One is that people such as artists who continually
question
their ability, as long as they keep getting up in the morning and
trying
again are generally really excellent, because they're always striving,
they're humble, they're interested in the process.
People
who are
totally content with their work, and say 'Boy, I'm terrific; I can't do
anything wrong', generally do not get better and are pretty
mediocre.
So
it's good
to have a healthy skepticism for your own work. But sometimes,
unfortunately,
with women, if there's a self-esteem issue, then it causes them to stop
working. One disturbing trend I see among gifted women is that
sometimes
a strong male figure in their life, a father or husband, boyfriend,
mentor,
or whatever, can shut them down very easily.
Sometimes
women
place way too much emphasis on what some guy has said to them about
their
work. I know with some of my own friends, some really brilliant writers
my own age, in the 35 to 40 year old range, at some point in their 20's
a boyfriend told them that the project they were working on wasn't
worthwhile,
so they literally quit it for ten years.
Or
they don't
send out work. I don't know why it's wired that way, but I think it is
a disturbing trend. It bothers me.
Q:
Hopefully,
making more women aware of that will be helpful.
A:
Sure. Either
they want to be good girls, good daughters, they're uncomfortable with
being smart and also pretty -- you know, there's an emphasis on being
pretty
and well-behaved. It's such a cliche, but I do still see it.
Q:
What could
you advise gifted women to shift out of a corporate life, for example,
and better realize their creative talents?
A:
Well, there's
no simple, easy path. I would suggest to begin to slowly, in easy steps
that you can digest. Probably to suddenly drop out of corporate life,
and
not have that income coming in anymore, and just be kind of trying to
stay
at home and discover your creativity, can be a recipe for disaster,
because
it's too extreme.
Women
also tend
to worry a lot about money, to think maybe they're going to become
bag-ladies
et cetera, so that can be so extreme and shocking, that it's almost too
scary a step.
So
it's probably
better just staying in the job for the moment, taking one or two
evening
writing classes or whatever, and slowly easing one's way into discovery
of what works well. Sometimes it's a jarring thing just to go from
having
a full schedule to being at home, having no schedule.
Being
at home
by yourself can be really depressing if you don't structure it. And
it's
a fine art, learning to structure your own time, and it takes a while.
I had a hard time with that, at the beginning.
An
adult education
program is great, whether it's painting or writing or whatever you're
interested
in. And find like-minded people within that class who are intelligent,
sensitive, who maybe share your goals of trying to express your selves,
and bind a little group together so you can bolster each other once a
month,
once a week.
That's
an invaluable
tool. I've been in women's writing groups for the last ten years
probably,
and they change every year. Sometimes we read pages, sometimes we meet
once a month and drink wine and complain about money. It's so important
to have people with similar goals and outlooks as you, to continue the
struggle.
There
are also
a lot of good books out, like "The Artist's Way" etc., that are good
workbooks
for people to work through their own creativity. That one is quite
terrific,
it's a best-seller and everyone reads it, and there's lots of
journaling
involved, and that's a great way to discover your own creativity.
On
the flip
side of that, though, what I find as a working artist in my own career,
is that sometimes I encourage women to 'be a man' about it, find 'the
soldier',
because it's a war, it's a battle. Creativity on your own is one thing,
if you get fulfillment from doing projects at home, and totally enjoy
that,
and it's helping you, that's terrific.
But
when you
want to take that work into the marketplace, then you just have to 'be
a man', you have to battle. There's a whole other set of weaponry that
comes along that women can use.
The
first, initial
phase is the self-exploration of creativity, the journaling, and the
support
and nurture. But if you want to go into the second phase, you just have
to 'be a man', and there's nothing wrong with that.
There's
a lot
of language of dysfunction around now, like 'computer impaired', and
sometimes
the language of creativity is like that, and it is true that people who
are creative are also quite often more sensitive and neurotic.
Creativity
is as good as therapy, a wonderful tool.
Sometimes
people
have writer's blocks, and they are the most elaborate, creative thing
about
them.
But
sometimes
you just need a kick in the butt so you're not languishing. Going ahead
and just writing, getting it out -- that helps you.
~ ~ ~
books by Sandra Tsing Loh
:
Aliens
in America
Depth
Takes A Holiday
If
You Lived Here, You'd Be Home By Now
~ ~ ~
related
Talent Development Resources pages:
achievement / success
articles
achievement, growth,
prosperity resources
change /
coaching
/ self-help articles
creativity enhancement
articles
article topics index
article
authors
~ ~ ~
|